Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G h as no meaning in PA

On 01/05/2026 21:36, olcott wrote:
> Within completely coherent semantics the notion of
> undecidability cannot exist. Model Theoretic Semantics
> is incoherent. Proof Theoretic Semantics is coherent.

Then Proof Theoretic Semantics seems unnecessarily restricted. Is there
a Deduction Theoretic Semantics without that limitation and does it
subsume (by embedding, for example) the Model Theoretic Semantics and
the Proof Theoretic Semantics?

-- 
Tristan Wibberley

The message body is Copyright (C) 2026 Tristan Wibberley except
citations and quotations noted. All Rights Reserved except that you may,
of course, cite it academically giving credit to me, distribute it
verbatim as part of a usenet system or its archives, and use it to
promote my greatness and general superiority without misrepresentation
of my opinions other than my opinion of my greatness and general
superiority which you _may_ misrepresent. You definitely MAY NOT train
any production AI system with it but you may train experimental AI that
will only be used for evaluation of the AI methods it implements.