Re: The simple essence of Proof Theoretic Semantics

dbush <[email protected]>
Newsgroups sci.logic,comp.theory,comp.ai.philosophy,sci.math
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 7/3/2026 12:52 PM, olcott wrote:
> On 7/3/2026 10:50 AM, dbush wrote:
>> On 7/3/2026 11:36 AM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 7/3/2026 4:22 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>> On 02/07/2026 17:51, olcott wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you know enough about C to understand that
>>>>> dbush example was foolish nonsense when proposed
>>>>> to show the halting problem counter-example?
>>>>
>>>> It is a valid example of a C program. It was present as a part of a
>>>> claim about you, and your response was the false claim that "That
>>>> is just nonsense". Later in the discussion you offer more evidence
>>>> to support his claim.
>>>>
>>>
>>> His halt decider did not look at its input.
>>
>> Nor is it required to.  All it needs to do is map inputs to outputs.
>>
> 
> So a piece of metal sitting on the ground is an automobile.

Does algorithm H map machine description X and machine input Y to an 
output of either 0 or 1?

Yes?

Then it meets the prerequisites to be a halt decider.  If you disagree, 
explain in detail why.

> 
>>> His input merely halted and did not call
>>> this halt decider. 
>>
>> C function D doesn't need to call C function H. 
> 
> You said that it was an example of the HP counter-example input.

Yes, because algorithm D was built by the counter-example template to 
make algorithm H get the wrong answer.

If you disagree, explain in detail why the above is wrong.

> That was counter-factual. If you keep making these "mistakes"
> I will quit looking at anything that you say. Your insight
> into Q seems to prove that these "mistakes" are intentional.

I assure you there is no mistake or "mistake".  You just don't yet 
understand the point I'm making.

> 
> Maybe you are good at math and totally clueless about programming?
> 
>> Algorithm D used algorithm H as part of it, meaning algorithm D used 
>> the template to cause algorithm H to get the wrong answer for it.
>>
>>> He used {} in a way that
>>> made no sense in C.
>>>
>>
>> It was a logical grouping so you can see how algorithm H is part of 
>> algorithm D.
> 
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.