Re: William T. Parry gets rid of Disjunction introduction
Mikko <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | sci.logic,comp.theory,comp.ai.philosophy,sci.math,alt.philosophy |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 04/07/2026 20:09, olcott wrote: > On 7/4/2026 3:15 AM, Mikko wrote: >> On 03/07/2026 17:50, olcott wrote: >>> On 7/3/2026 3:22 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>> On 02/07/2026 17:40, olcott wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hypotheticals are useful for making decisions. >>>> >>>> Which is an example of the usefulness of a break from reality. It >>>> als shows that calling a break from reality "psychotic" without >>>> further consideration. >>> >>> That Donald Trump might start WW III is a hypothetical >>> that can possibly be is useful. >> >> Whether Donald Trump will start WW III is not yet known, so that >> cannot be called an example of counter-factual. > > It is an example of hypothetical. You did not pay attention. I did. You did not. The topic of the discussion before the part shown above was counter-factual sentences. >>> That Donald Trump is the one and only Lord and Savior Jesus Christ >> > is a hypothetical that cannot possible be making it useless. >> >> Maybe, but irrelevent as you did not claim it be useful when you >> presented it. -- Mikko