Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G h as no meaning in PA
André G. Isaak <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | sci.logic,comp.theory,comp.ai.philosophy,sci.math |
|---|---|
| Organization | Christians and Atheists United Against Creeping Agnosticism |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2026-07-06 16:00, olcott wrote:
> On 7/6/2026 4:13 PM, André G. Isaak wrote:
>>
>> It is impossible to leap from {nothingness} to
>> 1987 Chevy Camaro with no steps inbetweem.
>
>> {Thing}--->{Physically Existing Thing}
>> ... {Motor Vehicle}---> {Automobile} ...
I did not write any of the above. Please don't claim that I did.
> Try to explain how the notion of 1987 Chevy Camaro
> pops into existence from out-of-nowhere with no
> prerequisite order.
>
If you want to know how concepts are actually organized, you need to
look at experimental evidence from psychology, psycholinguistics,
aphasiology, etc. They aren't organized into a tree where concepts have
parents. Armchair philosophizing (aka mental masturbation) isn't going
to get you anywhere.
André
--
To email remove 'invalid' & replace 'gm' with well known Google mail
service.