Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G h as no meaning in PA
André G. Isaak <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | sci.logic,comp.theory,comp.ai.philosophy,sci.math |
|---|---|
| Organization | Christians and Atheists United Against Creeping Agnosticism |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2026-07-06 16:58, olcott wrote:
> On 7/6/2026 5:53 PM, André G. Isaak wrote:
>> On 2026-07-06 16:41, olcott wrote:
>>> On 7/6/2026 5:18 PM, André G. Isaak wrote:
>>>> On 2026-07-06 16:00, olcott wrote:
>>>>> On 7/6/2026 4:13 PM, André G. Isaak wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is impossible to leap from {nothingness} to
>>>>>> 1987 Chevy Camaro with no steps inbetweem.
>>>>>
>>>>>> {Thing}--->{Physically Existing Thing}
>>>>>> ... {Motor Vehicle}---> {Automobile} ...
>>>> I did not write any of the above. Please don't claim that I did.
>>>>
>>>>> Try to explain how the notion of 1987 Chevy Camaro
>>>>> pops into existence from out-of-nowhere with no
>>>>> prerequisite order.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I know that I wrote it.
>>
>> So why did you attribute it to me?
>>
>
> I did not attribute it to you.
You messed up the attributions in your original post.
> I asked you to explain how it is wrong
> to prove that do not understand these things.
>
>>> You must show exactly how
>>> I am incorrect otherwise your fake rebuttal is
>>> simply hiding behind profound ignorance.
>>>
>>> > If you want to know how concepts are actually organized, you need
>>> to > look at experimental evidence from psychology, psycholinguistics,
>>>> aphasiology, etc. They aren't organized into a tree where concepts
>>>> have parents. Armchair philosophizing (aka mental masturbation)
>>>> isn't going to get you anywhere.
>>>>
>>>> André
>>>>
>>>
>>> They are organized as a type hierarchy.
>>> You either understand this or fail to comprehend.
>>
>> Please point to a single piece of experimental evidence which supports
>> this.
>>
>
> There is no experimental evidence to prove that
> the square root of two is a number.
Mathematics isn't an empirical field. The question of how concepts are
actually organized is.
André
>> Also, concepts aren't types, so they can't be organized as a type
>> hierarchy. A computer database might organize them as a hierarchy, but
>> not as a type hierarchy, and this hierarchy wouldn't reflect anything
>> about how actual people organize concepts.
>>
>> André
>>
>
>
--
To email remove 'invalid' & replace 'gm' with well known Google mail
service.