Re: Within Proof Theoretic Semantics Gödel's G h as no meaning in PA

André G. Isaak <[email protected]>
Newsgroups sci.logic,comp.theory,comp.ai.philosophy,sci.math
Organization Christians and Atheists United Against Creeping Agnosticism
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2026-07-06 16:58, olcott wrote:
> On 7/6/2026 5:53 PM, André G. Isaak wrote:
>> On 2026-07-06 16:41, olcott wrote:
>>> On 7/6/2026 5:18 PM, André G. Isaak wrote:
>>>> On 2026-07-06 16:00, olcott wrote:
>>>>> On 7/6/2026 4:13 PM, André G. Isaak wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is impossible to leap from {nothingness} to
>>>>>> 1987 Chevy Camaro with no steps inbetweem.
>>>>>
>>>>>> {Thing}--->{Physically Existing Thing}
>>>>>>    ... {Motor Vehicle}---> {Automobile} ...
>>>> I did not write any of the above. Please don't claim that I did.
>>>>
>>>>> Try to explain how the notion of 1987 Chevy Camaro
>>>>> pops into existence from out-of-nowhere with no
>>>>> prerequisite order.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I know that I wrote it.
>>
>> So why did you attribute it to me?
>>
> 
> I did not attribute it to you.

You messed up the attributions in your original post.

> I asked you to explain how it is wrong
> to prove that do not understand these things.
> 
>>> You must show exactly how
>>> I am incorrect otherwise your fake rebuttal is
>>> simply hiding behind profound ignorance.
>>>
>>>  > If you want to know how concepts are actually organized, you need 
>>> to  > look at experimental evidence from psychology, psycholinguistics,
>>>> aphasiology, etc. They aren't organized into a tree where concepts 
>>>> have parents. Armchair philosophizing (aka mental masturbation) 
>>>> isn't going to get you anywhere.
>>>>
>>>> André
>>>>
>>>
>>> They are organized as a type hierarchy.
>>> You either understand this or fail to comprehend.
>>
>> Please point to a single piece of experimental evidence which supports 
>> this.
>>
> 
> There is no experimental evidence to prove that
> the square root of two is a number.

Mathematics isn't an empirical field. The question of how concepts are 
actually organized is.

André

>> Also, concepts aren't types, so they can't be organized as a type 
>> hierarchy. A computer database might organize them as a hierarchy, but 
>> not as a type hierarchy, and this hierarchy wouldn't reflect anything 
>> about how actual people organize concepts.
>>
>> André
>>
> 
> 

-- 
To email remove 'invalid' & replace 'gm' with well known Google mail 
service.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.