Re: William T. Parry gets rid of Disjunction introduction
André G. Isaak <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | sci.logic,comp.theory,comp.ai.philosophy,sci.math |
|---|---|
| Organization | Christians and Atheists United Against Creeping Agnosticism |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2026-07-06 21:12, olcott wrote: > On 7/6/2026 10:03 PM, André G. Isaak wrote: >> On 2026-07-06 20:44, olcott wrote: >>> On 7/6/2026 9:41 PM, André G. Isaak wrote: >>>> On 2026-07-06 20:24, olcott wrote: >>>> >>>>> ∀x(φ(x) ∧ ¬φ(x)) ⊢ ⊥ >>>>> and >>>>> Γ ⊢ ⊥ >>>>> -------------------- >>>>> derivation terminated >>>> >>>> That's simply gibberish. >>>> >>>> André >>>> >>> >>> How do you think that: >>> From a contradiction nothing follows >>> should be encoded? >> >> Since you don't understand the formalism you're trying to use, why >> bother trying to formalize it? > > Both LLMs agree that I am already correct. LLMs carry no weight in my opinion. And since you can't clearly express yourself, it wouldn't be clear exactly what they were agreeing with anyways. >> You can simply state it in English. but what you're stating is simply >> false. > > I am overriding and superseding the psychotic break > from reality of the principle of explosion. > Numerous famous logicians have done this same > thing in several different ways. They've done it by adopting paraconsistent logics which raise their own set of problems. Most importantly, though, none of them have claimed to have removed the principle of explosion from classical logic. >> The fact that *anything* follows from a contradiction > > Is totally fucked up nonsense that only a psychotic > would not reject in less than three seconds. Since the overwhelming majority of logicians accept this having spent far more than three seconds contemplating it, you might want to reconsider your position. You really should contemplate the possibility that you have misunderstood the topic. >> isn't some axiom that can be removed from standard logic and replaced >> with something else. It's a consequence of the basic definitions used. >> >> André >> > > That breaks the coherence notion of truth. No, it does not. André -- To email remove 'invalid' & replace 'gm' with well known Google mail service.