Re: Terms-Of-The-Art are Liars
"Chris M. Thomasson" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | sci.logic,sci.math,comp.theory,comp.ai.philosophy,alt.philosophy |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7/6/2026 2:53 PM, dart200 wrote:
> On 7/4/26 2:12 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 7/4/2026 12:11 PM, dbush wrote:
>>> On 7/4/2026 1:07 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The English word "incomplete" establishes the base
>>>> meaning (parent node) in the knowledge ontology.
>>>>
>>>> I will not tolerate deceptive terms-of-the-art.
>>>
>>> In other words, you intend to lie by misusing definitions.
>>>
>> Math undecidable: The inability to translate
>> incoherent nonsense into a truth value.
>> LP := ~True(LP)
>> G := ~Provable(PA, G)
>>
>> Math Incomplete: The inability to accomplish
>> more than a system was defined to accomplish.
>> (∀x, S(x) ≠ x) cannot be proven in Q
>>
>> Math mapping from an input to an output:
>> Ignore the input and output a fixed constant.
>> int mapping_function(int x)
>> {
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>>
>
> i honestly don't think u can get around the liar's paradox with logic
> that treats statements of truth as universal
>
Is olcott a pedo? True or False. Well, he can answer that for us.