Re: Python recompile
Richard Heathfield <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.python |
|---|---|
| Organization | Fix this later |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 03/03/2025 08:13, [email protected] wrote: > On Sun, 2 Mar 2025 12:30:53 -0500 > James Kuyper <[email protected]> wibbled: >> On Sun, 02 Mar 2025 16:58:20 +0000, Muttley wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 2 Mar 2025 15:54:19 -0000 (UTC) >>> Lew Pitcher <[email protected]> gabbled: >>>> First off, this isn't really on-topic for comp.lang.c, as it is a question >>>> regarding a linker, interacting >>>> with the results of various options given to a specific compiler. >>> >>> Is there a comp.lang.c.linker group? >> >> comp.lang.c is about using the C programming language. Linkers are >> independent of the programming language, and can be used to link > > Without compilers and linkers a C program would just be a load of text. And without people to write it and buildings in which to work it wouldn't even be that, so by your argument everything from demographics to urban planning would be topical here. It's an old argument, but it has never been a good one. > >> together programs written in many different languages. The subject line >> and the text of the error messages indicate that it's a Python program, >> so why would a group devoted to C be in any way appropriate? > > If you'd taken 2 seconds to look at it you'd realise the issue was building > the Python source code which is written in C. That sounds like a C issue to me. Then you have very gullible ears. Building the Python source is an issue for a specific compiler group. -- Richard Heathfield Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999 Sig line 4 vacant - apply within