Re: Python recompile
[email protected] (Kenny McCormack)
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.python |
|---|---|
| Organization | The official candy of the new Millennium |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In article <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> wrote: >On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 11:39:58 -0500 >James Kuyper <[email protected]> wibbled: >>On 3/3/25 11:24, geodandw wrote: >>> On 3/3/25 10:22, James Kuyper wrote: >>>> On 03/03/2025 08:13, [email protected] wrote: >>.... >>>>> That sounds like a C issue to me. >>>> >>>> If it were a C problem, then the C source code that produced the problem >>>> should have been shown. It's hard to debug code that you can't see. >>> Why is this group so intolerant? >> >>Because what you call intolerance, we call topicality. When you post a >>message to a group where it is on-topic, the message gets seen and > >Only an arrogant idiot would think that errors on linking object files >generated by a C compiler are not relevant in a C language group. > > Indeed. And as you see, there is no shortage of arrogant idiots in comp.lang.c 'Tis always been thus, and always will be. BTW, I note that this thread is (still!) posted to 2 other groups, besides CLC, but the main topic of discussion in the thread (the usual topicality BS) is, of course, only relevant to CLC. Funny, that. -- The book "1984" used to be a cautionary tale; Now it is a "how-to" manual.