Re: Does Python Need Virtual Threads? (Posting On Python-List Prohibited)
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <[email protected]> Tue, 17 Jun 2025 02:12:03 -0000 (UTC)
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 21:02:46 -0700, Paul Rubin wrote: > I'd be interested in seeing some benchmarks of multi-threaded Python > beating Erlang, if you have any to show. Since you ask, I tried running up a simple program that creates lots of dummy threads that do nothing but sleep for a few seconds, and reports on its RAM usage by reading /proc/self/statm. I am currently up to a bit over 25,000 threads (the default limit is somewhere just under 26,000). The program reports its VM usage as over 200GB, which is way more than my total RAM + swap space, but in fact the free(1) command reports that RAM and swap usage are nowhere that high. The resident RAM usage while all the threads are running is reported at about 430MB. In other words, multiply that by 40, and a million threads should get the program’s RAM usage up to maybe 18GB.