Re: Python
Peter Flass <[email protected]> Thu, 18 Dec 2025 12:52:33 -0700
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc,alt.folklore.computers,comp.lang.python |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 12/18/25 11:00, Richard Kettlewell wrote: > Peter Flass <[email protected]> writes: >> I comment *A LOT*. When I had to go back and revisit some very old >> code, I wished I had commented more. I've almost never looked at a >> program and said "I wish it had fewer comments." > > Regrettably, I’ve encountered plenty of comments that don’t actually > reflect the code (for a variety of reasons). > > If the code is wrong and the comment is right then that’s great, you > have a nice hint about how to fix the code, assuming you realize there’s > a problem at all. > > However if the code is right but the comment is wrong then the comment > is worse than nothing. The code would be improved by removing it > (although almost certainly improved even more by correcting it). > > I’ve also encountered quite a few comments written by people who had > been instructed to add comments to under-commented code, but didn’t > really understand what they were looking at. The result generally > obscures more than it illuminates. > Since documentation never gets updated, if it's even created at all, comments are the best you can get most of the time.