π-WAM Assembly: Comfortable Labels and Goto (Re: π-WAM Contest: 1 Million Packets with Prolog)
Mild Shock <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, What Hamelt is to English language, is Hack to Compiler Construction. The playbook of Hack contains every drama that a Compiler Construction will face. In the following we show how we realized Project 6: Assembler from the Nand to Tetris journey via a little Prolog DSL. Our initial quick and dirty prototype deploys double buffering to determine code lengths and is brittle in examples such as between/3. Our assembly DSL does without symbol tables but with Prolog logical variables only. We could fix the between/3 glitch and give a first disjunction (;)/2 prototype. Bye See also: π-WAM Assembly: Comfortable Labels and Goto https://medium.com/2989/1a11dd512813 Mild Shock schrieb: > Hi, > > We recently demonstrated a Prolog emulator for > ADA RendezVous without ACK and NACK. This is basically > a bounded buffer with max_size=1. We now went on and > implemented this kind of fire and forget channel > object natively for JavaScript, Java and Python. > Some results. > > Our 100 producers and 100 consumers, that communicate > 10000 packets through a single channel, is the camel > to go through the eye of a needle test case. Both > π-WAM and SWI-Prolog can do it below a second using > different means, but π-WAM beats SWI-Prolog here > by a factor of ca. 1.5x. > > Bye > > See also: > > π-WAM Contest: 1 Million Packets with Prolog > https://medium.com/2989/ec3e91551773