Re: Blog: Is Fortran better than Python for teaching the basics of numerical linear algebra?

Lawrence D’Oliveiro <[email protected]>
Newsgroups sci.math,comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.python
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sun, 6 Sep 2026 15:32:53 -0000 (UTC), Thomas Koenig wrote:

> Fortran 77 makes little sense, modern Fortran variants (Fortran 90+)
> are available with free compilers and offer much more comfort and
> safety.

Python offers custom operator overloads, so you can write actual
operator expressions for addition, dot product etc -- closer in
appearance to the actual maths -- instead of parenthesis-ridden
function calls.

For a simple example, this method constructs a 3D homogeneous matrix
that performs arbitrary scaling about an arbitrary centre point:

    @classmethod
    def scaling_about(celf, factor : Vector4, centre : Vector4) :
        "constructs a Matrix4 that scales by the specified offset Vector4" \
        " about the specified centre."
        return \
          (
                celf.translation(centre)
            @
                celf.scaling(factor)
            @
                celf.translation(- centre)
          )
    #end scaling_about

From the body, you can see intuitively how it works, as the dot
product (“@” being the recommended Python operator to use for this) of
3 separate transformations: from right to left, you move the centre
point to the origin, perform the scaling about the origin, then
translate the origin back to the original centre point.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.