Re: Apple changed their documentation at my request but it proves they don't care about privacy
Keith Thompson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.internet.wireless,comp.lang.python,comp.mobile.android,misc.phone.mobile.iphone |
|---|---|
| Organization | None to speak of |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Maria Sophia <[email protected]> writes: > Keith Thompson wrote: >>> So, together, the Windows & Python newsgroup honed the working code. >>> Do you need me to supply the code for you again so you can run it? >> >> You haven't supplied it once. If you did, I personally would not be >> interested in running it, but it might at least be topical in >> comp.lang.python *if* anyone actually discusses the code. > > Hi Keith Thompson, > > Thank you for bringing up your point of view, as all points are valid here. > This is Usenet where we welcome deep detailed discussion of tech topics. Usenet welcomes technical discussion of topics that are relevant to the newsgroups in which they are posted. > Jon Ribbens clearly ran the code so we have proof that it was referenced > properly enough for him to have run it on his machine to prove the point. I don't know or care where Jon Ribbens obtained any Python code. Perhaps you provided it to him directly. It wasn't posted here. > Nonetheless, it's good you're *asking* for the Python code, which I only > ran on Windows 10, and which I'm happy to supply to you for all to review. I don't know how you misunderstood what I wrote so badly. I haven't asked for Python code. I've observed that you haven't posted any Python code, and therefore your posts should not be in comp.lang.python. If you want to talk about Python here in comp.lang.python, that's great. If you don't, I wish you'd go away. > Please keep in mind the progression of this topic started with this paper: > *Surveilling the Masses with Wi-Fi-Based Positioning Systems* > <https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.14975> > > As Jon Ribbens did, I simply ran the Python code in that article on my PC. Are you claiming that there's Python code in that paper? There is none in the PDF. (I didn't read it in any depth because it's not something I care about.) I see you've posted some Python source code later in this thread, along with Windows batch and PowerShell. Since you haven't said anything about the code (how it's written, what features it uses, how it could be improved), I suggest that it's (a) far too late to excuse you behavior so far, and (b) still inappropriate for comp.lang.python. Feel free to have the last word and pretend you've won. -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) [email protected] void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */