Re: Apple changed their documentation at my request but it proves they don't care about privacy

Maria Sophia <[email protected]>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python,misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android,alt.internet.wireless,alt.comp.os.windows-10
Organization BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com)
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Carlos E.R. wrote:
> The point we are saying is not what you claim it to be. It is not about 
> Apple storing and publishing BSSIDs of hidden SSIDs. This is bad 
> behaviour by them. Ok. But our point is that you gain nothing by making 
> your AP hidden in the first place.

Hi Carlos,

I disagree.

The answer to *this* question, will tell you why what you said is wrong:

Q: Will Google's WPS database contain a BSSID:GPS pair for an access point
   whose SSID broadcast is set to hidden (i.e., empty or null)?
A: Please answer "yes", or "no".

I know the answer to that question.
You clearly do not.

Once you know the answer to that question, you'll see why what you said, 
is dead wrong.

I could ask the same question of the Mozilla MLS, but it's now defunct, 
but they document this (and we published that documentation elsewhere).

Only Apple ignores the clear privacy intent of setting a hidden SSID.
Nobody else.

Just Apple. (to our knowledge)
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.