Re: Apple changed their documentation at my request but it proves they don't care about privacy
Lane W <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.lang.python,comp.mobile.android,alt.internet.wireless,alt.comp.os.windows-10 |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Chris wrote: > Jon Ribbens <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 2026-09-07, Chris <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Jon Ribbens <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> To me it's fairly intuitive that if someone has taken the unusual step >>>> of explicitly marking their network as "hidden", then its location >>>> should not be included in these databases - especially given the fact >>>> that the "_nomap" SSID method doesn't work for "hidden" networks. >>> >>> I guess the challenge here is how can they know not to add the MAC >>> address if the SSID with the "_nomap" request invisible. >> >> That's the core of the issue - I would guess that Android devices are >> only uploading BSSIDs to the Google database when they see that Access >> Point broadcast an SSID, and that SSID doesn't end with "_nomap". >> >> iPhones on the other hand, I would guess are uploading BSSIDs to the >> Apple database as soon as they see that Access Point broadcasting >> anything, regardless of whether they have seen an SSID from it. >> >> If it works the way I am suggesting, then it means that Google's >> database would automatically exclude "hidden" networks, and Apple's >> wouldn't - and not only that, Apple would have no way of immediately >> excluding them. They would need to issue updated iPhone software, >> and then wait until almost all iPhones in the world that were still >> in use were using the new software. >> >>>>> Related: What did Arlen (aka Maria) achieve? That Apple agreed to >>>>> remove all hidden and _nomap entries, or that they removed only his >>>>> entry? >>>> >>>> My impression is that as a result of Maria's communications with them, >>>> Apple updated their documentation to note that "hidden" networks are >>>> still listed in their database, and removed Maria's own BSSID(s) from >>>> the database. >>> >>> That's purely a correlation. It could be a coincidence. And is there >>> any evidence that the documentation did change? We only have his say so. >> >> We can't prove what prompted Apple to change their documentation, but >> we certainly can prove that it did indeed change, using archive.org. >> In December 2025 the page did not mention hidden networks, and today >> it does. >> >> https://web.archive.org/web/20251221213139/https://support.apple.com/en-ie/102515 >> https://support.apple.com/en-ie/102515 > > I agree. And I did the same. The fact that Arlen couldn't very easily > evidence his assertion, despite my challenge above, speaks volumes. > Why do you call him/her Arlen if his/her preferred name is Maria? Are you from the 70s?