Re: Winston Peters says Big Tech companies should be paying more tax in NZ

BR <[email protected]>
Newsgroups comp.misc,nz.general
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, 24 Jun 2026 02:02:16 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence DÿOliveiro
<[email protected]> wrote:

>Big Tech companies get loads of revenue from NZ, but pay very little
>back in tax
><https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360997144/lost-our-nerve-winston-peters-says-big-tech-companies-should-be-paying-more-tax-nz>.
>This is typical of the accounting games they play:
>
>    An example he gives is Google NZ, which in 2024 had revenues of
>    $1.139bn but incurred ‘service fees’ of $1.052bn from its
>    Singapore-based subsidiary. It left a taxable profit of just $29m.
>
>And yes, this kind of profit-and-loss merry-go-round is legal.
>Provided you employ a high-priced tax consultant to tell you how to do
>it right.
>
>NZ First party leader Winston Peters says he’s in favour of those
>companies paying more tax in NZ. But on the other hand he didn’t like
>the idea of his own department dropping support for them by ceasing to
>post on X/Twitter.
>
>Some politicians are in favour of legal measures to force a
>behavioural change. But on the other hand, fear of how the current ??
>President might react has been slowing progress ...
><https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/360996333/diminishes-us-country-what-we-lose-when-govt-gives-16m-ad-money-social-media>.

Do the people they employ here pay tax?

Bill.

-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.