Re: Winston Peters says Big Tech companies should be paying more tax in NZ
BR <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | comp.misc,nz.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 24 Jun 2026 02:02:16 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence DÿOliveiro <[email protected]> wrote: >Big Tech companies get loads of revenue from NZ, but pay very little >back in tax ><https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360997144/lost-our-nerve-winston-peters-says-big-tech-companies-should-be-paying-more-tax-nz>. >This is typical of the accounting games they play: > > An example he gives is Google NZ, which in 2024 had revenues of > $1.139bn but incurred Âservice fees of $1.052bn from its > Singapore-based subsidiary. It left a taxable profit of just $29m. > >And yes, this kind of profit-and-loss merry-go-round is legal. >Provided you employ a high-priced tax consultant to tell you how to do >it right. > >NZ First party leader Winston Peters says heÂs in favour of those >companies paying more tax in NZ. But on the other hand he didnÂt like >the idea of his own department dropping support for them by ceasing to >post on X/Twitter. > >Some politicians are in favour of legal measures to force a >behavioural change. But on the other hand, fear of how the current ?? >President might react has been slowing progress ... ><https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/360996333/diminishes-us-country-what-we-lose-when-govt-gives-16m-ad-money-social-media>. Do the people they employ here pay tax? Bill. -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com