Re: BSD Fragmentation
Lawrence D’Oliveiro <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 1 Jul 2026 10:07:22 -0000 (UTC), Anthk GM wrote: > On 2026-06-07, Lawrence D’Oliveiro <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> And yet Linux can manage more disciplined changes that don’t do >> random things like break filesystem compatibility. This is why you >> can have 300 different Linux distros that will interoperate more >> freely than half a dozen BSD variants are able to manage. > > You are wrong there. With GNU/Linux it's always the same kernel. > Every BSD has a different userland *and* kernel. They are different > *operating systems* alltogether. You are not refuting what I said, you are merely reinforcing my point. And all those different BSD variations are basically still addressing the same sorts of applications -- desktop/workstation/server. Whereas the single Linux kernel has found application in a much wider variety of areas, like handheld and embedded devices, for example. Same kernel. Same compatibility. No fragmentation.