Re: SSD TBW
Don Y <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | comp.misc,sci.electronics.design |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/21/2026 6:30 PM, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: > On Fri, 21 Aug 2026 16:20:30 -0700, Don Y wrote: > >> [Often, older sources would disappear so rsync(1) was a bad choice] > > There’s a way around that: you can use the “--link-dest” option to > create multigenerational backups, with deduping of unchanged files. > Or, if the files are too small to bother with deduping, just do the > rsync to a new destination directory each time. I usually use BeyondCompare to compare/DL source and target directories. It lets me see both and get a feel for how much work needs to be done. Also highlights differences (size/timestamp) between the two in those cases when both have a file but they obviously differ I have lots of cases of foo being renamed foo.old on my copy so the remote foo doesn't overwrite it; then foo.older, foo.oldest, etc. -- a place where versioning could be of benefit (but, some other repo might have a different notion of foo that I will have to reconcile with my instances. >> But, the small size and the fact that it had a built-in TINY >> display and keyboard eventually grew tiresome. > > Would you believe, it was small enough to fit in a pants pocket -- at > least on one pair of pants I had at the time ;). You're either a "big person" or where HUGE pants! :> A checkbook is about the largest item that I can put into a pants pocket. Phone sticks out (need a smaller phone!) > I remember using it heavily at a client’s place, to SSH into the > Asterisk server to watch its logs while debugging the integration of a > predictive dialler with my call-management system and coordinating > with the operator making the test calls. I inherited this one when a buddy's wife died. He asked me to remove all of her email and personal information and then recycle it (I do volunteer work at a place that recycles various types of kit). Once wiped, I figured it would make a nice LITTLE "self-contained" machine to save me the hassle of dragging out a monitor, "CPU" and keyboard. And, it did that job well (doesn't take much horsepower to connect to an FTP service and transfer files to an external drive). But, I had *seven* laptops -- 17 inch displays, etc. -- just collecting dust in the closet. (did I mention that I volunteer at a place that recycles kit??) "So, do I discard the EeePC, or one of the laptops, especially given that the laptops are more capable (and usable!) machines?" Now, if I don't want to drag out the laptop, I've configured a NUC with the same software and use the TV in the living room as the monitor. [This windows machine would be a bad choice to perform the mirror as differences in filesystem support would eat my lunch]