Re: MX Linux
rbowman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 24 Jun 2026 11:51:24 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote: > On 2026-06-24 03:34, rbowman wrote: >> On Tue, 23 Jun 2026 21:57:58 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > > >> Interesting that it builds the modules for the 6.17.0.14-generic kernel >> while it seems to be a DIY process for Leap 16. Among other things the >> error dialog on Leap 16 says it requires make, gcc, and kernel-devel >> headers. The Mint box does not have make. > > There is a new iso, announced yesterday. I got further with 7.0.16 on Mint but it still wasn't a success. My first attempt was TrixiePup64. The VM started up but was a terminal, not a desktop and reported it had exited from labwc. startlabwc also exited immediately. Next up was the Leap 16 offline iso. The initial screen had 4 options, boot from a DVD, install Leap, safely install Leap or exit. Choosing install brought up the familiar Agama installer. I selected Xfce for variety and started the install. The Mint machine isn't the fastest so that took a while before the screen announced it had been successfully installed and to reboot. Rebooting brought up the initial installation screen, not Leap 16. To make sure the new VB modules hadn't affected kvm_intel I created a TrixiePup64 VM which started up with labwc. So in my experience the RPMFusion version on Fedora 44 is the only one that installs correctly and works. It is 7.2.8, not the 7.0.16 Ubuntu version. fwiw lsmod on Fedora also shows the vbox* modules.