Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip
Charlie Gibbs <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,alt.magic.secrets,alt.conspiracy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2026-06-30, c186282 <[email protected]> wrote: > On 6/30/26 09:51, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote: > >> On 6/30/2026 5:14 PM, c186282 wrote: >> >>>> Can you fabricate 0.000000...0000000001 nm chips? >>>> >>>> Is zero the seal or wall? :) >>> >>> Um, pretty quick you get to ATOMS ... and, for any >>> normal electronics, that's IT. >> >> You cannot have 0.000000....00 nm chip. >> >> That's a void, empty, nothing. :) I tried to think through the implications of this but I got a divide error. > "Electronics" are now about literal atom-thick structures. > Can't go any smaller. > > Any better future stuff will have to exploit quantum > effects - get more bang for yer nanometer. Alas quantum > stuff isn't as deterministic as bulk matter devices > and suffer from the uncertainty principle. Omigod, we might have to revive the KISS principle in order to get anything more done. The proponents of complexity as a weapon will be so disappointed... -- /~\ Charlie Gibbs | No artificial \ / <[email protected]> | intelligence was X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | used in the creation / \ if you read it the right way. | of this post.