Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip
c186282 <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,alt.magic.secrets,alt.conspiracy |
|---|---|
| Organization | wokiesux |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 6/30/26 19:45, rbowman wrote: > On Tue, 30 Jun 2026 12:06:38 -0400, c186282 wrote: > >> Any better future stuff will have to exploit quantum effects - get >> more bang for yer nanometer. Alas quantum stuff isn't as >> deterministic as bulk matter devices and suffer from the uncertainty >> principle. > > Physics was a 4 semester course and the 4th was quantum when it started to > get weird. On one essay test I wrote about Heisenberg's uncertainty > principle versus Heidegger's principle uncertainty. Fortunately the > professor had a sense of humor or maybe he realized how far off the beaten > path the original quantum guys got when you start thinking about the Being > of beings. Hey, all we need is a "Heisenberg Compensator" :-) As for the old Quantum Guys (maybe a few gals) - they weren't really WRONG. The calx are the calx. Yea, it's a Weird Weird World - nothing sympathetic to the human nervous system - but then it's all NOT *ABOUT* US.