Re: IBM - New SUB-Nanometer STACKED Chip

The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.misc
Organization A little, after lunch
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 05/07/2026 04:45, c186282 wrote:
> Putin, well, seems to think HE is the only one
>    privy to the Thoughts Of Gawd. We've seen people
>    like that before - but they didn't have a huge
>    army or nuclear arsenal.
> 

Neither, it turns out, does Putin.
Consider:
You are a paranoid minority supported dictator on fear of your own 
minions and the West.
If NATO decides to take you, it can. You don't realise that the last 
thing NATO wants is to have to run Russia.

You cant do the all out war thing. But what you can do is spin a legend. 
The legend of the madness of dictators who will push the red button if 
threatened. You can fund every single radical left or right  political 
group in your enemies ranks from Black lives matter to pro Lifers.

You can fund any group spreading the pretended horror of nuclear war, 
weapons and power stations.

Meanwhile you do a huge military on the cheap. A few nuclear tests show 
you have the Bomb, and a few missile runs show you have the delivery.

The rest on parade in Red Square might as well be cardboard.  They're 
not real. They are there to support the legend of a militarily powerful 
nation armed with nuclear weapons it is not afraid to use.

And finally you have the Reptile fund. For the clandestine purchasing 
and blackmail of free world politicians. And media influencers. How many 
Hollywood nuclear horror movies were funded indirectly from the Kremlin?

>>>    Trump IS a 'charismatic leader' - hardly the
>>>    first or last. Would you prefer boring bcrats
>>>    and functionaries instead - incapable of
>>>    doing anything or unifying anyone ?
>>>
>> Id prefer quiet competence and a small state.
> 
>    "Quiet competence" doesn't get it DONE. Gotta
>    be Out Front - or ELSE.
> 
Oh, but it does. You just don't notice it happening.


>    As for a "small state" - while I'd kinda LIKE that
>    I'm just not sure it's viable anymore - more an
>    1800s agri-nation sentiment.
> 
Of course it is possible.
But turkeys don't vote for Christmas

>>>    Hey, we can re-elect "W" !
>>>
>> WTF is 'W'?
>> Winnie the Pooh?
> 
>    Wow .........
> 
>    Ultra-Revisionist 'history' classes eh ?
> 
No, just not steeped in US folklore.
If you had said 'Dubya' I would have known.



>    How can you plot a path to The Future if you don't
>    even know where you've BEEN, even recently ???

The incoherent parochialism, of the American Indoctrinated is not of 
particular concern to  ROW...

-- 
“It is hard to imagine a more stupid decision or more dangerous way of 
making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people 
who pay no price for being wrong.”

Thomas Sowell
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.