Re: WSL keeps getting better, and it's because Microsoft is finally admitting where developers want to be

Rich <[email protected]>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.misc
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <[email protected]>
c186282 <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 7/4/26 20:02, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
>> On Sat, 4 Jul 2026 18:41:39 -0000 (UTC), Robert Heller wrote:
>> 
>>>> <https://www.xda-developers.com/wsl-keeps-getting-better-and-its-because-microsoft-is-finally-admitting-where-developers-want-to-be/>
>>>>
>>> It is also *probably* too little too late.
>> 
>> Quote:
>> 
>>      ... Microsoft really does need to make its OS comfortable for
>>      Linux developers to work in, because the alternative involves
>>      people ditching Windows entirely. For Microsoft to maintain its
>>      user base, it has to ensure that its operating system can do
>>      everything better than its competitors, and if that includes
>>      allowing people to code Linux apps instead of using its own tools,
>>      then that's what it needs to do.
>> 
>> But if what its operating system is supposedly “doing better than
>> competitors” is “running a Linux stack”, then pretty much by
>> definition, native Linux itself will always do that better than any
>> Windows-with-Linux-bag-hanging-off-the-side two-headed FrankenOS can
>> manage.
> 
>   That's the LOGICAL view.
> 
>   'Consumers' don't see it that way. They've
>   always used Winders and can't think outside
>   that box.

Those same "consumers" you reference are also not "using WSL to develop 
linux software".  Those "consumers" won't ever do anything beyond "use 
the OS that came on the computer from the store".

If anything, this points to at least two possibilities:

1) the technical knowledge of "software developers" has fallen to such 
a low level that they are incapable of installing Linux for themselves 
and just go with windows (which came installed when they bought the 
computer) and jump into WSL for their dev work.

2) a great many "software developers" are using "corporate machines" 
and the "corporate overlords" are still firmly stuck in the "we must 
have windows, and active directory, and msteams, and msoutlook, and 
msword, and msexcel, and ms-the-rest" world and the developers are 
dropping into WSL as that's their only option for a sane software 
development environment on their corporate machine that is otherwise 
locked down by the overseers.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.