Re: Interesting - Ukraine Missiles Use Open Source, Russians Use Pi-4s
Rich <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
rbowman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 20 Jul 2026 12:24:42 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > >> On 19/07/2026 23:55, Computer Nerd Kev wrote: >>> rbowman <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> On Sat, 18 Jul 2026 19:38:31 -0400, c186282 wrote: >>>>> Meanwhile, everything made in USA costs a million dollars per >>>>> unit and take forever to build. >>>> >>>> I forget who said 'Generals do not end wars; accountants do.' >>>> Estimates vary but the Tamir missile used by Iron Dome costs >>>> around $50K. When you use them to blow up a $5K DJI drone the >>>> costs add up fast. That's chicken feed compared to the cost of a >>>> Tomahawk. >>> >>> The USA and Israel are getting deep into laser weapons now >> >> UK already has them > > DragonFire might be operational next year and may live up to the > hype. Apparently US air defense systems aren't 100% successful, The > media seem reluctant to examine the repercussions of Iran hitting US > assets in Jordan. And therein lies the problem with "swarms of cheap drones". The attacker can build, and launch, 50 "low cost drones" (granted, $50k seems a lot, but it is 'low cost' as compared to a US Military missle of 5M and up each) at an attack target. The drone defense has to be 100% perfect every time because if even one drone survives to its target, some damage will be taken by the target. And it is very unlikely *any* of the air/drone defense systems are 100% perfect every time. Plus, if the "drone defence" is firing anything that is more costly to build than the drone itself, then there is a significant asymetric cost factor applied to the defender as well.