Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late
Farley Flud <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
|---|---|
| Organization | UsenetExpress - www.usenetexpress.com |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 26 Jul 2026 20:00:30 -0000 (UTC), John McCue wrote: > > For example, users want a browser that blocks ads, no > java script, no AI, fast and lite on memory and can read > any site without dealing with cloudflare. What are > corporations giving us ? Nothing but spyware, ads, DRM > and soon ID checks. > There are alternative browsers. Palemoon is a good example. But since browsers have stopped being just a program to render HTML markup and have become a portal for executing foreign software on user machines, development of an alternative browser is almost an impossible task for an independent team. Web standards, defined by international authorities, should be strictly enforced but they are not. The fault in large part lies with the user who does not take the time and effort to demand from web sites that they conform. > > To me, most distros are very close to becoming an exact > clone of M/S Windows or Apple OS. The way things are > going it will be almost impossible to tell these apart > in maybe 5 to 10 years. > Yes. Quite correct. The single thing that is making this monolithicity possible is SYSTEMD (that is its purpose). All the users (i.e. moochers) who blindly accept systemd are complicit in this corruption of GNU/Linux. Fortunately, this only applies to "most" distros. There are alternatives but these always will be in the fringe. Once Torvalds retires, for whatever reason, from his stewardship the degeneration of Linux will only accelerate. The GNU project needs to make their Hurd kernel a top priority as the future of Linux is total corporate domination with a lack of freedom. -- Gentoo/LFS: Is there any-fucking-thing else?