Re: Open-Source Armchair Critics At It Again

On 28/07/2026 10:59, Carlos E. R. wrote:
> On 2026-07-28 10:59, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>> On 27/07/2026 18:55, Carlos E. R. wrote:
>>> On 2026-07-27 19:24, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>> On 27/07/2026 14:45, Andreas Eder wrote:
>>
>>>> Where does the electricity come from then?
>>>
>>> Irrelevant. The car itself doesn't use fuel :-D
>>>
>> Depends on your definition of 'fuel'
>>
>>
> 
> It combusts with oxygen producing heat and expands dramatically.
> 
So uranium isn't 'fuel' then. And organic life doesn't use 'fuel' either?

It's a loose term, used by people today in many different contexts 
beyond 'something for the fire' which is where the word originates...

Today its more used as 'something that can supply 'free energy' (free in 
the thermodynamic sense, not economic)


-- 
New Socialism consists essentially in being seen to have your heart in 
the right place whilst your head is in the clouds and your hand is in 
someone else's pocket.