Re: Open-Source Armchair Critics At It Again

On 2026-07-28 12:25, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> On 28/07/2026 10:59, Carlos E. R. wrote:
>> On 2026-07-28 10:59, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>> On 27/07/2026 18:55, Carlos E. R. wrote:
>>>> On 2026-07-27 19:24, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>>> On 27/07/2026 14:45, Andreas Eder wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Where does the electricity come from then?
>>>>
>>>> Irrelevant. The car itself doesn't use fuel :-D
>>>>
>>> Depends on your definition of 'fuel'
>>>
>>>
>>
>> It combusts with oxygen producing heat and expands dramatically.
>>
> So uranium isn't 'fuel' then. And organic life doesn't use 'fuel' either?
> 
> It's a loose term, used by people today in many different contexts 
> beyond 'something for the fire' which is where the word originates...
> 
> Today its more used as 'something that can supply 'free energy' (free in 
> the thermodynamic sense, not economic)
> 
> 
In the context of cars, no, I restrict it.

-- 
Cheers,
        Carlos E.R.
        ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;