Re: Open-Source Armchair Critics At It Again
"Carlos E. R." <[email protected]> Wed, 29 Jul 2026 19:13:47 +0200
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2026-07-28 17:22, Rich wrote: > c186282 <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 7/27/26 00:42, rbowman wrote: >>> On Sun, 26 Jul 2026 21:23:57 -0400, c186282 wrote: >>> >>>> They DID promise atomic-powered cars back when I was a little kid. >>>> Wonder what happened ? >>> >>> Ford didn't make any promises with the Nucleon. It was a concept based on >>> small, lightweight reactors becoming available in the future. Never >>> happened. >>> >>> I do remember Chrysler's turbine car from the '64 World's Fair. There were >>> working prototypes but that didn't prove out either. >> >> Turbines aren't great for automobiles. >> >> We CAN make 'em cheap enough now - but they are not very fuel >> efficient and take too long to wind up and down. >> >> So, no "Batmobiles". >> >> "Hybrids", using a small constant-speed diesel as the recharge >> generator ... those can be very efficient. > > Which is also a "usage point" for "turbines". Run them at > constant-speed spinning a generator, then use the resulting electricity > for battery recharge. > > But you still have to deal with the "not terribly efficient" factor for > a car sized model, plus the heat generated by the turbine combustion > process. > In theory, you could run a second turbine on those hot gases of the exhaust. -- Cheers, Carlos E.R. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;