Re: Open-Source Armchair Critics At It Again
"Carlos E. R." <[email protected]> Wed, 29 Jul 2026 21:59:13 +0200
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2026-07-29 20:59, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > On 2026-07-29, Carlos E. R. <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 2026-07-29 19:17, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> >>> On 29/07/2026 18:13, Carlos E. R. wrote: >>>> >>>> In theory, you could run a second turbine on those hot gases of the >>>> exhaust. >>> >>> Its called a turbocharger. >> >> On piston motors, yes. I have never seen a turbine powered car, so I >> don't know what they actually do. > > Look and sound sexy. > >> I understand a turbocharger generates compressed clean air to feed the >> motor intake; this is not needed for a turbine car plant. > > Yes it is; you still have to compress the fuel-air mixture before you > burn it. The compressor is an integral part of a turbine engine. Sure; but you do not need an extra external compressor doing it. Instead, you put another wheel on the turbine. Turbines can have wheel sets spinning at different speeds. > >> What a car would do is use the exhaust hot gases to generate more >> electricity instead. > > That's a possibility. However, it might be easier to just drive > a generator off the main turbine, like aircraft engines do. Sure, that is the goal of the most modern tries of turbine powered cars. The turbine powers a generator that charges a battery that powers electric motors that spin the wheels. What is called a series hybrid. -- Cheers, Carlos E.R. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;