Re: Multi-Networking in Linux - Multiple Subnets
The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]> Thu, 30 Jul 2026 14:59:10 +0100
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
|---|---|
| Organization | A little, after lunch |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 30/07/2026 14:53, Andy Burns wrote: > Marc Haber wrote: > >> Carlos E. R. wrote: >> >> eth0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 >>> inet 192.168.2.9 netmask 255.255.0.0 broadcast >>> 192.168.255.255 >> >> Using the entire 192.168.0.0/16 range for a single home network is a >> sure sign of a person not knowing too much about networking or an >> incompetent ISP. >> >>> Works for me as above :-) >> >> Until the moment you'd want to connect to another network. > If you want multiple IP subnets on a single ethernet network, you'd be > better off using VLANs, even cheapo switches can handle that, then your > linux box with a single NIC can have VLAN sub-interfaces e.g. eth1.1 on > 192.168.0.1/24 and eth1.10 on 192.168.1.0/24 > > If you don't want VLANs you *could* use a NIC alias so that e.g. eth1 is > on 192.168.0.1/24 and the alias eth1:2 is on 192.168.1.1/24 ... but why? > > They look the same to me. -- The difference bweteen a psychopath and a saint is that the psychpoath takes what he can and gives only what he must, but the saint gives everything he can and takes only what he needs.