Re: Multi-Networking in Linux - Multiple Subnets
"Carlos E. R." <[email protected]> Fri, 31 Jul 2026 13:38:36 +0200
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2026-07-30 18:43, Marc Haber wrote: > "Carlos E. R." <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 2026-07-30 13:42, Marc Haber wrote: >>> "Carlos E. R." <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> eth0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 >>>> inet 192.168.2.9 netmask 255.255.0.0 broadcast 192.168.255.255 >>> >>> Using the entire 192.168.0.0/16 range for a single home network is a >>> sure sign of a person not knowing too much about networking or an >>> incompetent ISP. >> >> The ISP configures the router so that it is mandatory to use >> 192.168.1.*, and they take a good chunk of it for their own usage. I >> have no recourse but using this non standard network. I use 192.168.2 >> for dhcp assignments. > > With a /16 Netmask, covering the entire 192.168 RFC 1918 range, as if > we have plenty of IPv4 addresses? > > Please, let me see that ISPs customer documentation. They do have it > online, don't they? I'm familiar with that industry for nearly 30 > years and have never seen a setup like that. It sounds so brain-dead > that my first idea was that you haven't understood. There is no documentation. They keep it secret. What is known is by reverse engineering. -- Cheers, Carlos E.R. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;