Re: WiFi range ...
c186282 <[email protected]> Fri, 31 Jul 2026 23:34:54 -0400
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
|---|---|
| Organization | wokiesux |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7/31/26 19:00, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: > On Sun, 31 May 2026 21:19:08 -0700, Lars Poulsen wrote: > >> My company's high reliability radios use essentially 20 year old WiFi >> technology, and we have customers than routinely run them over distances >> of 5-10 km. > > In the early days of wi-fi, when many people were using it to set up > point-to-point links to extend access to those limited early broadband > deployments, it was common to use an empty Pringles chip can as a > high-gain antenna. Saw an article where somebody spliced in a REAL antenna to a RPi - and got a HUGE range increase. Probably illegal but, really, nobody's checking. WiFi has pretty shitty range. The 2ghz band tends to work better - 5ghz is more blocked by obstacles. I have a big enough property where I had to buy an 'extender' to improve coverage to out-buildings. Not expensive, several makers have them, work OK. Had best success with TP-Link. Setup can be a bit weird, counter-intuitive, but you'll get it. Some of the older data links - 400 or 900mhz band - do have kilometer+ range. However the data rate might not meet modern needs. Ya ain't gonna be streaming 8K over them.