Re: Manipulating C code at the AST level, in C
The Natural Philosopher <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.misc |
|---|---|
| Organization | A little, after lunch |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 22/08/2026 02:46, c186282 wrote: > On 8/21/26 02:10, rbowman wrote: >> On Thu, 20 Aug 2026 23:42:12 -0400, c186282 wrote: >> >>> But, if you wanna boost yer GPA, just take in a "psychology" course. >>> Very VAGUE pseudo-science shit. Mostly just remember the Holy Men in >>> the "science". Easy "A". Owned a PRINTER - made very NEAT looking >>> papers. Added a point to the GPA right there ! >> >> That all depends on the flavor of psychology. >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Experimental_psychology >> >> What do you know about neurophysiology? Given a brain can you identify >> the optic chiasm? > > There are a few branches still called "psychology" > but are really 'physiology' or 'neurology'. Those > are testable SCIENCE. > > IMHO, they should distance themselves from the > shameful pseudoscience bulk of 'psychology'. > Indeed. Freud is actually metaphysics. Because it starts with 'lets assume' that people are absolutely dominated by their early relationships within their families. Especially with men, their mothers. Well the stereotypical 'Yiddishy Momma' is indeed a formidable force in any Jewish family, but in others? Not really I certainly never wanted to kill my father. And I was revolted by the idea of sleeping with my mother. And does the unconscious mind actually exist? If you delve deep enoughits a s slippery as God. And indeed there are grounds for saying that it IS god, at some deep level of cognition. The agency that forms the shape of the reality you experience. But science? No way. It's hypotheses are impossible to prove or disprove. Its like 'critical race theory' It's a way to look at the world, a metaphysical notion, not one that can be upheld or refuted by any even handed tests. -- The New Left are the people they warned you about.