Re: XSLT for webpages
Jeffrey Rubard <[email protected]> Wed, 2 Feb 2022 00:08:53 -0800 (PST)
| Newsgroups | comp.text.xml |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Monday, January 31, 2022 at 5:27:04 PM UTC-8, Jeffrey Rubard wrote: > On Monday, March 1, 2004 at 3:58:59 PM UTC-8, Jeff Rubard wrote:=20 > > Jeff Rubard wrote:=20 > > > On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 22:34:11 +0000, Jeff Rubard wrote:=20 > > >=20 > > >=20 > > >>Andy Dingley wrote:=20 > > >>=20 > > >>>On 20 Feb 2004 14:14:00 -0800, [email protected] (Jeff Rubard)= =20 > > >>>wrote:=20 > > >>>=20 > > >>>=20 > > >>>=20 > > >>>>>P.S. By the way, who is Eric (not Tony)?=20 > > >>>>=20 > > >>>>Seriously, who is this guy? Is this the British Oskar Lafontaine?= =20 > > >>>=20 > > >>>=20 > > >>>Google for Eric+Orwell+pseudonym=20 > > >>=20 > > >>Okay.=20 > > >>=20 > > >>Simplicio: Questo non pu=C3=B2 essere, perch=C3=A9 le generatzioni, m= utatzioni=20 > > >>etc. che si facesser, verbigrazia, nella Luna, sarebber inutile e van= e,=20 > > >><<et natura nihil frustra facit>>.=20 > > >>=20 > > >>I look not for a substantive faculty, but for the generations, mutati= ons=20 > > >>and the like: what it lights upon, joyful noise, a moon of cilia, wou= ld=20 > > >>useless and accessible <<and nature causes nothing in vain>>.=20 > > >>=20 > > >>Galileo, *Dialogues*=20 > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > I guess that's not how it works at all, though.=20 > > That is, as long as you don't remember the Marne and Ferdinand Foch,=20 > > as per the joke. > 2022 Update: Yeah, this wasn't the most. Not everybody can work in IT, either.