Re: Window eyes verses JAWS
Jeff Kenyon <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.accessibility.vision |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Well, I started out with Window Eyes when I got Windows in 1996, and it was 3.1 for Windows and I couldn't get Window Eyes to budge after it was installed in my machine for school. I eventually switched to JAWS, first at school and then at home with 3.2 and have been with JAWS since 1999. However, I've been hearing some good things about Window Eyes and the sign on with Microsoft was one thing that made me think they'd b be taking off soon. On Sat, 10 Nov 2007, Albert Ruel wrote: > > > > Hi all. I've always been a JAWS user, however I think that had I tried > Window Eyes first I likely would have stayed with it. After all, my father > was a Chevy man, so that's where I went as well. There-in lays my opinion > on the matter. Both are good and most of us argue the merits of the one we > like as fervently as do Chrysler and Ford lovers. > > Thx, Albert > > _____ > > From: Visually Impaired Computer Users' Group List > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve Sweeney > Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 8:40 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [VICUG-L] Window eyes verses JAWS > > > > > Hi, > Yes, Window Eyes does a great job both with remote access and Citrix. I do > not know how I would function with out remote access. I use it every day > remoting in to either my computer or one of the servers. > > Take care. > Steve Sweeney, N4OFL, EC > and > > > _____ > > From: Visually Impaired Computer Users' Group List > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dorene Cornwell > Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 8:42 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [VICUG-L] Window eyes verses JAWS > > > > > > In a message dated 11/9/2007 5:35:44 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, > [email protected] writes: > > What branches of government and what agencies? I had thought about > getting Window Eyes a few years ago had I gotten in with a hospital that > heavily u uses Citrix and remote access. > > > I have not information about WIndow Eyes and Citrix, but if Window Eyes > works better with Citrix that would indeed be a good reason to try it. > > The person I talked to works somewhere in the Dept of Defense. I did not > probe where exactly his customer works because at a certain point for a > number of reasons I decided I did not necessarily need to know. > > Best > > Dorene Cornwell > > > > > _____ > > See what's new at AOL.com <http://www.aol.com?NCID=AOLCMP00300000001170> > and Make AOL Your Homepage > <http://www.aol.com/mksplash.adp?NCID=AOLCMP00300000001169> . > _____ > > > Leave list: [email protected] > > > VICUG-L is archived on the World Wide Web at http://listserv.i > <http://listserv.icors.org/archives/vicug-l.html> cors.or > g/archives/vicug-l.html > > > Send questions on list operation to [email protected] > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.26/1119 - Release Date: 11/8/2007 > 5:55 PM > > > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.26/1119 - Release Date: 11/8/2007 > 5:55 PM > > > _____ > > Leave list: [email protected] > > > VICUG-L is archived on the World Wide Web at http://listserv.i cors.or > <http://listserv.icors.org/archives/vicug-l.html> g/archives/vicug-l.html > > > Send questions on list operation to [email protected] > > > > VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List. > Archived on the World Wide Web at > http://listserv.icors.org/archives/vicug-l.html > Signoff: [email protected] > Subscribe: [email protected] > > > > VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List. Archived on the World Wide Web at http://listserv.icors.org/archives/vicug-l.html Signoff: [email protected] Subscribe: [email protected]