Re: [lkb] SPPP

>>> Is SPPP the only way to pass ambiguous morphological output to the LKB? 

You may want to download documents at www.kodaxil.org (as pdf file).

A partial answer to text analysis in various languages  is provided,
including Hebrew

Avner Levy



Emily M. Bender wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Some colleagues and I are trying to figure out SPPP, in the context of
> hooking up a morphological analyzer for Hebrew (U. Haifa/Shuly
> Wintner) to a Hebrew grammar based on the Matrix (UW/Margalit
> Zabludowski).  We would like to preserve the ambiguity found by the
> morphological analyzer and let the (syntactic) grammar disambiguate as
> it can.  Thus, SPPP looks like it might be the right way to go.
> 
> However, from the wiki page (LkbSppp), it seems like SPPP is expecting
> the external binary to be able to produce output that corresponds to
> LKB rules rather than (say) a lattice of segmentations of the input
> form.  Is the general idea to take such a form-based lattice and then
> (with another, still external, script) change them to SPPP XML with
> the LKB rule identifiers projected from the forms themselves?  Does
> anyone have any such XML-generating code lying around that we could
> work from?  Is SPPP the only way to pass ambiguous morphological output
> to the LKB?
> 
> Thanks,
> Emily
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SPPP-tf2028781.html#a6498029
Sent from the Linguistic Knowledge Builder (LKB) mailing list archive at Nabble.com.