Re: [lkb] Redundancy detection
Ann Copestake <[email protected]> Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:18:22 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.ai.lkb |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] said: > Is it possible to turn off the functionality that discovers where exactly the > redundancy is after an error message like "Redundancy involving IMP-AUX" is > printed? With my current grammar at least, there seems to be a lot of > gargbage collecting involved in figuring out what exactly the redundancy is; > I can usually spot it way faster than the machine can. hmm - I just looked at the code that does that - the inefficiency is clear. If it's annoying you, the easiest thing to do would just be to put in a patch e.g., in your user-fns file that redefines the function e.g., (defun find-all-redundancies nil (format t "Redundancy somewhere but I'm not going to tell you where!")) I don't really want to put in a global variable that switches the check off because it's just one more thing to (not) document and I believe that find-all-redundancies can be rewritten. I will have a look at it sometime. Ann