Re: Procedural attachment in PowerLoom
Hans Chalupsky <[email protected]> Fri, 17 Nov 2006 17:42:44 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.ai.powerloom |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Cameron, PowerLoom does support the attachment of native procedures to relations either as computations or reasoning specialists. These procedures can compute a value or do some special-purpose reasoning implemented in code (examples are arithmetic computations, comparison operators, reasoning with units and measures, etc.). There are also demons that you can attach to relations that fire when a propositions becomes true or false or unknown via assertion/retraction or during forward inference. I'm not sure that's the kind of procedural attachment you are looking for. There is nothing that you can link to the firing of a rule (PowerLoom is not a production system), unless you make it a forward rule and attach a demon to the relation in the consequent. For example (note the =>> arrow marking this as a forward-only rule): (assert (=>> (and (rich ?x) (beautiful ?x)) (happy ?x))) (assert (goes-true-demon happy my-happy-demon)) Whenever the above rule infers somebody to be happy, `my-happy-demon' would run with the proposition that became true as an argument. You can look at PL-KERNEL/assert-synonym-demon in powerloom/sources/logic/specialists.ste as an example. The demon code doesn't necessarily have to be written in STELLA, even though it might be a bit easier depending on what you want it to do. We currently support registration of a native function as a specialist via pli/register-specialist-function, we might have to write something similar for demons, but that would be fairly easy to do. Hans -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Chalupsky, PhD USC Information Sciences Institute Project Leader, Loom KR&R Group 4676 Admiralty Way <[email protected]> Marina del Rey, CA 90292 (310) 448-8745 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> Cameron Ross <[email protected]> writes: > Hello PowerLoom list, > I'm currently evaluating PowerLoom as a possible KR&R engine for a > project I'm working on. One of the requirements of this project is that > it must be possible to trigger native procedures (i.e. Java methods) > when certain rules within the knowledge-base fire. Is this sort of > functionality currently supported in PowerLoom? If not, would it be > possible to add such support. Note that I have programming resources > available that wish to dig into STELLA if required. > Cheers, > Cameron Ross > President > Symboticware Incorporated > _______________________________________________ > powerloom-forum mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.isi.edu/mailman/listinfo/powerloom-forum