Re: Access GUM with Powerloom

Hi Ian,

I was very interested to read this:

>I am doing a project on Generalized Upper 
>Model.  I would like to ask is it possible to import GUM to PowerLoom? 
>
In case you would be interested, we are currently engaged in a major
revision of the GUM, which will include its re-expression in OWL and
other current ontology standards.

We would also be very interested in seeing your conversion into
PowerLoom if you get it working. Perhaps we could swap representations?

I also wonder what it is that your project is doing with it. Any info
would be most welcome.

Best,
John Bateman.

------------------------------------
Uni Bremen
http://www.uni-bremen.de/~bateman