Re: English Generation
Hans Chalupsky <[email protected]> Mon, 1 Oct 2007 13:02:07 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.ai.powerloom |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Charles, I'm sorry to say that nothing new has happened on this front from our end. The project that might have put more funds towards that line of work never went beyond the design phase. Hans >>>>> Charles J Klein <Klein> writes: > I searched through the archives for any discussion of autogeneration of > English renditions of statements in a Powerloom KB. Has there been any > development since Hans' statement, below? If so, could someone please > point me to the relevant documentation? > A new cognitive theory of emotion, > http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/aleader >> From [email protected] Mon Oct 20 20:45:52 2003 > From: [email protected] (Hans Chalupsky) > Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 12:45:52 -0700 > Subject: [PowerLoom Forum] assertion to English conversion? > In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> > References: <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > There is no standard PowerLoom mechanism yet to do this. The `lexeme' > and `phrase' assertions in pl-kernel-kb.ste are only some initial > steps towards a capability like this. NL-rendering is fairly easy for > most ground assertions such as `(father-of frank joe)' (you could > easily write this yourself if you really need it). Solving this > generically for rules is much more difficult if you want to generate > language that can actually be understood by humans. We are therefore > considering a template-based approach to handle this problem for one > of our new projects. Depending on how things go a simple NL-rendering > capability might become available sometime next year. > Hans > <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> > <HTML><HEAD> > <META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> > <META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.20641" name=GENERATOR></HEAD> > <BODY> > <DIV><SPAN class=148145817-01102007><FONT face=Arial size=2>I searched > through the archives for any discussion of autogeneration of English renditions > of statements in a Powerloom KB. Has there been any development since Hans' > statement, below? If so, could someone please point me to the relevant > documentation?</FONT></SPAN></DIV> > <DIV><SPAN class=148145817-01102007><FONT face=Arial > size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV> > <DIV><SPAN class=148145817-01102007><FONT face=Arial > size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV> > <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV> > <DIV>A new cognitive theory of emotion, > http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/aleader<BR><BR>From [email protected] Mon > Oct 20 20:45:52 2003<BR>From: [email protected] (Hans Chalupsky)<BR>Date: Mon, 20 Oct > 2003 12:45:52 -0700<BR>Subject: [PowerLoom Forum] assertion to English > conversion?<BR>In-Reply-To: > <[email protected]><BR>References: > <[email protected]><BR>Message-ID: > <[email protected]><BR><BR>There is no standard > PowerLoom mechanism yet to do this. The `lexeme'<BR>and `phrase' > assertions in pl-kernel-kb.ste are only some initial<BR>steps towards a > capability like this. NL-rendering is fairly easy for<BR>most ground > assertions such as `(father-of frank joe)' (you could<BR>easily write this > yourself if you really need it). Solving this<BR>generically for rules is > much more difficult if you want to generate<BR>language that can actually be > understood by humans. We are therefore<BR>considering a template-based > approach to handle this problem for one<BR>of our new projects. Depending > on how things go a simple NL-rendering<BR>capability might become available > sometime next year.<BR><BR>Hans<BR></DIV></BODY></HTML> > _______________________________________________ > powerloom-forum mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.isi.edu/mailman/listinfo/powerloom-forum