Re: Powerloom, a first stab...
Thomas Russ <[email protected]> Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:06:46 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.ai.powerloom |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mar 26, 2010, at 1:51 AM, Gerard Toonstra wrote: > Before looking at powerloom, I looked at JSHOP2. JSHOP2 can solve > planning problems, but it requires compilation > of the KB and the language is certainly not as rich as powerloom's > for the expression of particular relations and so forth. > Is powerloom well suited for planning problems in general? I haven't > found any demos or tutorials that > show how it's used for those kinds of problems. I think that you could use PowerLoom as the knowledge and state repository for a planning system. We don't have any actual planning reasoners that work with the PowerLoom representation, although that is a nice idea to explore. By and large, planning systems don't normally use a very rich representation language, often just having a propositional logic formalism. So I think you could get some nice results from using a powerful representation language with its own inference capabilities along with a planning system. -Tom. -- Thomas A. Russ, Ph.D. Senior Research Scientist [email protected] USC/Information Sciences Institute http://www.isi.edu/~tar 4676 Admiralty Way, Marina del Rey, CA 90292 (310) 448-8775