call as a substitute for macros or functional programming?
Ross Boylan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.ai.prolog.swi |
|---|---|
| Organization | UCSF |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I have code that I'm using with various small modifications; at the moment I do this by copying, pasting and editing. In other languages I could avoid this by passing functions into functions or using a macro/template system. It looks as if call/n will give me something like functional programming, e.g., silly(Src, Dest, Op) :- call(Op, Src, Dest). ?- silly(path([ostempserver1]), S, content_for). gives the same result as ?- content_for(path([ostempserver1]), D). Is this the right approach? Are there others I should consider? Thanks.