Re: Attempt at approximating Lisp's "macroexpansion"

On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Jan Wielemaker <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 07/17/2013 05:49 PM, Ian Tegebo wrote:
> [...]
>> [...] I got into the habit of using module/1 at the top-level for the
>> convenience of atom completion.
>
> Atom completion is not module-aware.  Typically, you just type the goal
> in the user module and expect DWIM to add the module for you.

Ah, right you are.  I forgot that I actually do it to avoid the extra
prompt and input resulting from DWIM.  Anyway, thanks for looking into
the issue with the toplevel.

--
Ian Tegebo