Re: Attempt at approximating Lisp's "macroexpansion"

On 07/17/2013 08:41 PM, Ian Tegebo wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Jan Wielemaker <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 07/17/2013 05:49 PM, Ian Tegebo wrote:
>> [...]
>>> [...] I got into the habit of using module/1 at the top-level for the
>>> convenience of atom completion.
>>
>> Atom completion is not module-aware.  Typically, you just type the goal
>> in the user module and expect DWIM to add the module for you.
>
> Ah, right you are.  I forgot that I actually do it to avoid the extra
> prompt and input resulting from DWIM.  Anyway, thanks for looking into
> the issue with the toplevel.

It was a bit harder than I expected because the toplevel parses queries
with the outdated atom_to_term/3 interface.  Added a 
read_term_from_atom/3 that provides the required flexibility and pass
the input module to it.

	Cheers --- Jan