Re: term_expansion/2 with DCG clauses

Hi,

I find your question hard to understand.  Could you please give an example of what it is that you are after?

Thanks,
-- Feliks

On Aug 13, 2013, at 14:02, Wouter Beek <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> What would be the recommended way for replacing regular Prolog
> predicates with DCG rules? I would be nice if I could use the
> syntactic sugar / `-->`-notation in formulating the replacing rules.
> 
> I was thinking of using term_expansion/2, but `ResultTerm =..
> [-->,Head,Body]` would not be correct since `-->` is not the name of
> the predicate.
> 
> ---
> Cheers!,
> Wouter.
> 
> E-mail: [email protected]
> WWW: www.wouterbeek.com
> Tel.: 0647674624
> _______________________________________________
> SWI-Prolog mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.iai.uni-bonn.de/mailman/listinfo.cgi/swi-prolog