Re: Remarks on SWI 7
Ulrich Neumerkel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.ai.prolog.swi |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jan Wielemaker: >As it stands, Prolog compatibility is a joke. Practical programming >requires much more than what ISO has standardised. Paulo has succeeded An illustrative example how you are refusing to cooperate for built-ins outside core but in the context of ISO. This is open since two years: http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/ulrich/iso-prolog/length 9 systems were considered, 5 moved immediately after Lexington to the agreed upon behaviour. But not SWI. Even more ironic in this case is that I have written the core list traversal routines (first Floyd, then after I got the hint, Brent) for SWI to make this fast. It has nothing to do with your workload, it is another issue.