Re: Remarks on SWI 7
Boris Vassilev <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.ai.prolog.swi |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAFw8osKPaSb3ikKT_uBFnHo1x099VZOFK86XocHyRg6rQ1iGvg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Richard A. O'Keefe <[email protected]>wrote: > the empty list (ALONE amongst the vast range of atoms used to > terminate recursive structures) > I foresee a future in which young SWI-Prolog programmers use [] everywhere as *the terminator*, or *the empty thing*, or *not a value*. Like, bin_tree(a, bin_tree(b, [], []), bin_tree(c, [], [])). or maybe: % Add all numbers, ignoring missing values sum([], 0). sum([X|Xs], Sum) :- sum(Xs, Sum_rest), ( X == [] -> Sum = Sum_rest ; Sum is Sum_rest + X ). People are shaking their heads, "O brave new world, that has such code in it." I find it difficult to explain why this is not a valid approach. -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed