Re: Remarks on SWI 7
Alan Baljeu <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.ai.prolog.swi |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>> the empty list (ALONE amongst the vast range of atoms used to >> terminate recursive structures) >> > >I foresee a future in which young SWI-Prolog programmers use [] everywhere >as *the terminator*, or *the empty thing*, or *not a value*. Like, > > bin_tree(a, bin_tree(b, [], []), bin_tree(c, [], [])). >... >I find it difficult to explain why this is not a valid approach. Perhaps because it is a valid approach?