Re: Remarks on SWI 7
Michael Richter <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.ai.prolog.swi |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGKutLscpRHpWVQaEpmMvnyMtYtcYUZZ=tB=pTeof+jikss1wA@mail.gmail.com> |
On 29 November 2013 19:45, Ulrich Neumerkel <[email protected]>wrote: > In any case, that is the very idea of having as many Prolog > people together to resolve such issues. I'm curious as to what you consider "many" and "Prolog people" to actually mean. Right now I'm seeing two people, primarily, ranting about this. Is this "many"? Are these the only "Prolog people"? -- "Perhaps people don't believe this, but throughout all of the discussions of entering China our focus has really been what's best for the Chinese people. It's not been about our revenue or profit or whatnot." --Sergey Brin, demonstrating the emptiness of the "don't be evil" mantra. -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed